I didn’t give up and searched forever until I found this video that was not with a copyright on it and with Ray Mears at his best again.
I have seen many documentaries but he’s one among the best!
Enjoy it 🙂
Velvet
Immaculate
Dazzling
Hypnotizing
Serenade your praises
Archangel’s dream
Adorn the branches
Stars in abundance
Black night
Mirror lake
Glittering lights
On a somnolent town
Illuminated day
Numbed nature
Your coat shines
Magic captivated
Mirage of a sojourn
Time of a route
Treasure among duties
Images against a buffer
Sumptuous
Delicate
Ephemeral
Sparkling
The archangels
Psalmody
Your apologia
With ease
I ambition
Pray, negotiate
So that, desire
Transforms, Transposes
I wake up
And marvel
To find myself
In the past
I fall back to sleep
And step out
Of my treasures
My heart implores
____________
Neige
——
Veloutée
Immaculée
Aveuglante
Hypnotisante
Seriner tes louanges
Les archanges rêvent
Revêtir les branches
Étoile en abondance
Nuit noir
Lac miroir
Lumières scintillantes
Sur une ville somnolente
Journée illuminée
Nature engourdi
Ton habit brille
Magie captivée
Mirage d’un séjour
Le temps d’un parcours
Trésors parmi devoirs
Images contre un butoir
Somptueuse
Délicate
Ephémère
Etincelante
Les archanges
Psalmodient
Ton apologie
Avec aisance
J’ambitionne
Prie, négocie
Pour que désire
Se transpose, transforme
Je me réveille
Et m’émerveille
De me trouver
Dans le passé
Je me rendors
Et sort
De mes trésors
Mon cœur implore
Here is one Lecture I found fascinating, the other one was, ” The Biology of perception ” which is fascinating too!
Enjoy! 🙂
Harvard: Justice what’s the right thing to do 05 ( Michael Sandel )
Uploaded by Harvard on Sep 8, 2009
PART ONE: HIRED GUNS
During the Civil War, men drafted into war had the option of hiring substitutes to fight in their place. Professor Sandel asks students whether they consider this policy just. Many do not, arguing that it is unfair to allow the affluent to avoid serving and risking their lives by paying less privileged citizens to fight in their place. This leads to a classroom debate about war and conscription. Is todays voluntary army open to the same objection? Should military service be allocated by the labor market or by conscription? What role should patriotism play, and what are the obligations of citizenship? Is there a civic duty to serve ones country? And are utilitarians and libertarians able to account for this duty?
PART TWO: MOTHERHOOD: FOR SALE
In this lecture, Professor Sandel examines the principle of free-market exchange in light of the contemporary controversy over reproductive rights. Sandel begins with a humorous discussion of the business of egg and sperm donation. He then describes the case of Baby M”—a famous legal battle in the mid-eighties that raised the unsettling question, Who owns a baby?” In 1985, a woman named Mary Beth Whitehead signed a contract with a New Jersey couple, agreeing to be a surrogate mother in exchange for a fee of $10,000. However, after giving birth, Ms. Whitehead decided she wanted to keep the child, and the case went to court. Sandel and students debate the nature of informed consent, the morality of selling a human life, and the meaning of maternal rights.
Category:
Education
License:
Standard YouTube License
I’ll give you today the first five lectures and will go on another time.
Enjoy!
Uploaded by Harvard on Sep 8, 2009
PART ONE: THIS LAND IS MY LAND
The philosopher John Locke believes that individuals have certain rights so fundamental that no government can ever take them away. These rights—to life, liberty and property—were given to us as human beings in the the state of nature, a time before government and laws were created. According to Locke, our natural rights are governed by the law of nature, known by reason, which says that we can neither give them up nor take them away from anyone else. Sandel wraps up the lecture by raising a question: what happens to our natural rights once we enter society and consent to a system of laws?
PART TWO: CONSENTING ADULTS
If we all have unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, how can a government enforce tax laws passed by the representatives of a mere majority? Doesnt that amount to taking some peoples property without their consent? Lockes response is that we give our tacit consent to obey the tax laws passed by a majority when we choose to live in a society. Therefore, taxation is legitimate and compatible with individual rights, as long as it applies to everyone and does not arbitrarily single anyone out.
Category:
Education
License:
Standard YouTube License
998 likes, 55 dislikes
Show less